|
Introduction |
I have been fascinated by Wallis for
many years now and have absorbed just about everything I can find in
terms of biographical information (much of which I will make
available here). I have taken
the opportunity to view Wallis's work at various exhibitions and
have been privileged to view several notable private collections. I
also make a point of viewing Wallis works as/when they appear at
various UK salerooms. My regular contacts include Wallis scholars,
relatives, collectors and locals who retain either first or second
hand memories of the primitive painter.
I am often approached by private owners who wish to sell paintings,
including works by Wallis. Unfortunately, I often have to disappoint
people by informing them that their "Wallis" is a later
copy. It is a fact that copies have been produced by admirers of
Wallis, particularly since the mid to late 1980's, when Wallis's
profile rose significantly, but few copies would have been produced
before this time. Indeed, on the subject of potential copies, Edwin
Mullins (Alfred Wallis, Cornish Primitive Painter -
published 1967) was quite adamant that none existed.
Provenance is without doubt very important when it comes to works
by Wallis. However, many genuine works do surface from time-to-time
from deceased estates and the like, and a painting or drawing should
never be disregarded on the basis that it has no firm provenance.
Apart from the paintings sold direct to his London sponsors and
their circle, which accounts for over a thousand works, many
visitors to St Ives during the 1920's and 1930's would have
purchased paintings from Wallis during his famous "open days"
(see biography), probably
accounting for a similar number of works. Most of these direct
buyers would have considered their purchase as nothing more than a
souvenier, maybe to be displayed in their homes for a few years and
eventually relegated to a cupboard or attic. It is therefore quite
easy to see how such paintings, when 'discovered' by future
generations have little or no provenance, and end up in house
clearances, low-end auctions or are discarded. In 1967 Mullins
estimated the number of works he had personally seen at over one
thousand, and he knew of many, many more. Mullins said that half or
more of these could be disregarded on the grounds of quality, noting
that many were "scrappy bits of paper of little or no
artistic value". See also Wallis -
The Artist
Unfortunately a catalogue raisonné of Wallis's work does not
exist, nor is there a single recognised authority on his work. There
are a handful of "Wallisphiles" who do have an intimate
knowledge of his work, and I include myself in this category.
Having studied hundreds of paintings I have decided to share my
experience and methodology with fellow "Wallisphiles" and
hope that it will provide some useful insight.
To navigate this section please follow the links (left). |
|